Validation and updating of risk models based on multinomial logistic regression
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 3 April 2016
Accepted: 9 September 2016
Published: 8 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathleen Kerr|
|22 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell|
|13 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin French|
|13 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Ben Van Calster|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin French|
|26 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathleen Kerr|
|31 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Ben Van Calster|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Sep 2016||Editorially accepted|
|8 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s41512-016-0002-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.