Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Systematic review of the effects of care provided with and without diagnostic clinical prediction rules

  • Sharon L. Sanders1Email author,
  • John Rathbone1,
  • Katy J. L. Bell1, 2,
  • Paul P. Glasziou1 and
  • Jenny A. Doust1
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research20171:13

DOI: 10.1186/s41512-017-0013-2

Received: 20 December 2016

Accepted: 6 April 2017

Published: 26 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roderick Venekamp
29 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Thompson
22 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sharon Sanders
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
6 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
26 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s41512-017-0013-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University
(2)
Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney

Advertisement