This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Development and validation of prediction models for risk of adverse outcomes in women with early-onset pre-eclampsia: protocol of the prospective cohort PREP study
- John Allotey1, 2, 3,
- Nadine Marlin2Email author,
- Ben W. Mol4,
- Peter Von Dadelszen5,
- Wessel Ganzevoort6,
- Joost Akkermans7,
- Asif Ahmed8,
- Jane Daniels9,
- Jon Deeks10,
- Khaled Ismail11,
- Ann Marie Barnard12,
- Julie Dodds1, 2, 3,
- Sally Kerry2,
- Carl Moons13,
- Khalid S. Khan1, 2, 3,
- Richard D. Riley14 and
- Shakila Thangaratinam1, 2, 3
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 15 June 2016
Accepted: 9 October 2016
Published: 20 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sebhat Erqou|
|12 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sally Lord|
|7 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - John Allotey|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sally Lord|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Oct 2016||Editorially accepted|
|20 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s41512-016-0004-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.