Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Development and validation of prediction models for risk of adverse outcomes in women with early-onset pre-eclampsia: protocol of the prospective cohort PREP study

  • John Allotey1, 2, 3,
  • Nadine Marlin2Email author,
  • Ben W. Mol4,
  • Peter Von Dadelszen5,
  • Wessel Ganzevoort6,
  • Joost Akkermans7,
  • Asif Ahmed8,
  • Jane Daniels9,
  • Jon Deeks10,
  • Khaled Ismail11,
  • Ann Marie Barnard12,
  • Julie Dodds1, 2, 3,
  • Sally Kerry2,
  • Carl Moons13,
  • Khalid S. Khan1, 2, 3,
  • Richard D. Riley14 and
  • Shakila Thangaratinam1, 2, 3
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research20171:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-016-0004-8

Received: 15 June 2016

Accepted: 9 October 2016

Published: 20 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sebhat Erqou
12 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Lord
7 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - John Allotey
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Lord
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 Oct 2016 Editorially accepted
20 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s41512-016-0004-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Women’s Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London
(2)
Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London
(3)
Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (MESH), Queen Mary University of London
(4)
The Robinson Research Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide
(5)
Institute of Cardiovascular and Cell Sciences, St George’s, University of London
(6)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre
(7)
Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center
(8)
Aston Medical School, Aston University
(9)
University of Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit
(10)
School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham
(11)
Birmingham Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Birmingham
(12)
Action on Pre-eclampsia (APEC) Charity
(13)
Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht
(14)
Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University

Advertisement