This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The comparative diagnostic accuracy of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the General Practitioner assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) for identifying dementia in primary care: a systematic review protocol
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 10 March 2017
Accepted: 1 May 2017
Published: 2 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Orestis Efthimiou|
|6 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christiana Naaktgeboren|
|19 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Harriet Hunt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s41512-017-0014-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.