Skip to main content

Table 1 (abstract P40). Diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-9 by reference standard

From: Methods for Evaluation of medical prediction Models, Tests And Biomarkers (MEMTAB) 2018 Symposium

 

Semi-structured

Reference Standard

N studies = 29

N participants = 6,725

N major depression = 924

Fully structured

Reference Standard

N studies = 14

N participants = 7,680

N major depression = 839

Difference across reference standards

(Semi- Fully)

Cutoff

Sensitivity

Specificity

Sensitivity

Specificity

Sensitivity

Specificity

5

0.98

0.55

0.93

0.54

0.05

0.01

6

0.98

0.63

0.91

0.61

0.07

0.02

7

0.98

0.69

0.86

0.69

0.12

0.00

8

0.95

0.75

0.82

0.75

0.13

0.00

9

0.91

0.80

0.74

0.79

0.17

0.01

10

0.88

0.85

0.70

0.84

0.18

0.01

11

0.84

0.89

0.62

0.87

0.22

0.02

12

0.79

0.91

0.57

0.89

0.22

0.02

13

0.70

0.93

0.49

0.92

0.21

0.01

14

0.64

0.95

0.44

0.94

0.20

0.01

15

0.56

0.96

0.35

0.96

0.21

0.00