Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Do we know enough about the effect of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer on survival to act? A systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Study

Country

Recruitment time

Screening programme

Comparator

Sample size, N

Participants age (yrs)

Number of screening rounds

Screening times and interval (yrs)

Duration of follow-up (mean/ median)

Direct meta-analysis and network meta-analysis – RCTs of LDCT screening

DANTE [22]

Italy

03/2001 to 02/2006

LDCT, medical exam and one CXR

No screening, medical exam and one CXR

2,811 (2,400 planned)

60-74

5 vs 0

T0, T1, T2, T3, T4

At 12/2012 median 6 yrs 3.5 months

DLCST [23]

Denmark

10/2004 to 03/2006

LDCT

No screening

4,104

50-70

5 vs 0

T0, T1, T2, T3, T4

Median: 9.47 yrs vs 9.53 yrs (planned 10yrs)

MILD [24]

Italy

09/2005 to 09/2011

LDCT (annual and biannual), smoking cessation, pulmonary function test, blood sample

No screening, smoking cessation, pulmonary function test, blood sample

4,099 (10,000 planned)

>49

10 or 5 vs 0

T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9

vs

T0, T2, T4, T6, T8

Median 7.3 yrs

NLST [8, 25]

USA

08/2002 to 04/2004

LDCT

CXR

53,454

55-74

3 vs 3

T0, T1, T2

Median 6.5 yrs

Network meta-analysis (main) – RCTs of CXR screening

Czech [26, 27]

Czech republic

06/1976 to 06/1977

Intensive CXR, sputum cytology

Single CXR, sputum cytology

6,346

40-64

6 vs 1

T0, T0.5, T1, T1.5, T2, T2.5, T3 vs T0, T3.

Further follow-up CXRs (no sputum) T4, T5,T6 in both arms

15 yrs all participants

MAYO [28]

USA

08/1971 to NR (screening ended 07/1976)

Intensive CXR, sputum cytology

Usual care (recommended an annual CXR and sputum cytology)

9,211

>45

18 vs unknown

T0.3, T0,7, T1, T1.3, T1.7, T2.0, T 2.3, T2.7, T3, T3.3, T3.7, T4, T4.3, T4.7, T5, T5.3, T5.7, T 6 (4 monthly) vs unknown

Median 20.5 years

Network meta-analysis (sensitivity) – RCTs of CXR screening (post hoc defined high risk sub-group of larger RCT)

PLCO [29]

USA

1993 to 2001

CXR

No screening

154,901 (30,321 NLST eligible subgroup)

55-74

4 vs 0

T0, T1, T2, T3

6 yrs all participants NLST eligible subgroup

  1. Abbreviations: CXR chest X-ray, LDCT low-dose computed tomography, RCT randomised controlled trial, N not reported, yrs years