Skip to main content

Table 2 ICER for patients with the highest lifetime benefit-based treatment estimates and the highest 10-year risk-based treatment estimates

From: Would treatment decisions about secondary prevention of CVD based on estimated lifetime benefit rather than 10-year risk reduction be cost-effective?

Cut-off value5% of patients treated10% of patients treated20% of patients treated
 CostsQALYsICERCostsQALYsICERCostsQALYsICER
No treatment€111,727,41165,897-€111,732,87165,935-€111,620,05865,893-
Lifetime benefit-based treatment€153,997,68167,057€36,440/QALY€194,164,60568,014€39,650/QALY€269,495,92869,704€41,426/QALY
10-year risk-based treatment€153,071,52666,755€48,187/QALY€192,212,13167,443€53,368/QALY€266,326,90968,846€52,390/QALY
  1. Costs and QALYs are given for the scenario of 10,000 patients
  2. QALYs quality-adjusted life years, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio