From: PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts: a new addition to the toolbox for test accuracy research
Section and topic | Item no. | Description |
---|---|---|
Title and purpose | ||
Title | 1 | Identify the report as a systematic review (+/− meta-analysis) of diagnostic test accuracy studies. |
Objectives | 2 | Indicate the research question, including components such as participants, index test, and target conditions. |
Methods | ||
Eligibility criteria | 3 | Include study characteristics used as criteria for eligibility. |
Information sources | 4 | List the key databases searched and the search dates. |
Risk of bias and applicability | 5 | Indicate the methods of assessing risk of bias and applicability. |
Synthesis of results | A1 | Indicate the methods for the data synthesis. |
Results | ||
Included studies | 6 | Indicate the number and type of included studies and the participants and relevant characteristics of the studies (including the reference standard). |
Synthesis of results | 7 | Include the results for the analysis of diagnostic accuracy, preferably indicating the number of studies and participants. Describe test accuracy including variability; if meta-analysis was done, include summary results and confidence intervals. |
Discussion | ||
Strengths and limitations | 9 | Provide a brief summary of the strengths and limitations of the evidence. |
Interpretation | 10 | Provide a general interpretation of the results and the important implications. |
Other | ||
Funding | 11 | Indicate the primary source of funding for the review. |
Registration | 12 | Provide the registration number and the registry name. |