Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Methodological concerns about “concordance-statistic for benefit” as a measure of discrimination in predicting treatment benefit

Original Submission
28 Nov 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jorgen Hilden
27 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeroen Hoogland
11 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Yuan Xia
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeroen Hoogland
14 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Yuan Xia
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
17 Apr 2023 Editorially accepted
16 May 2023 Article published 10.1186/s41512-023-00147-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page