Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The development and validation of prognostic models for overall survival in the presence of missing data in the training dataset: a strategy with a detailed example

Original Submission
12 Jul 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Aug 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Sperrin
9 Sep 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Elizabeth Cowley
31 Mar 2020 Author responded Author comments - Kara-Louise Royle
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Mar 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Apr 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Sperrin
18 Apr 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Elizabeth Cowley
29 Oct 2020 Author responded Author comments - Kara-Louise Royle
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Oct 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kara-Louise Royle
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Mar 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kara-Louise Royle
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Mar 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Jun 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kara-Louise Royle
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Jun 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 Jun 2021 Editorially accepted
4 Aug 2021 Article published 10.1186/s41512-021-00103-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page