Skip to main content

Table 1 Methodological quality of model development studies for outcome following moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in terms of applicability and risk of bias assessed with the original PROBAST and models’ usability in research and clinical practice

From: Does poor methodological quality of prediction modeling studies translate to poor model performance? An illustration in traumatic brain injury

Study

Models

Applicability

Risk of bias

Usability

Participant selection

Predictors

Outcome

Overall applicability

Participant selection

Predictors

Outcome

Analysis

Overall RoB

Research

Practice

Knaus

APACHE II

H

L

L

H

L

L

L

H

H

y

y

Le Gall

SAPS II

H

L

L

H

L

L

L

H

H

n

y

Lemeshow

MPM II models

H

L

L

H

L

L

L

H

H

n

n

Signorini

Signorini

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

H

H

n

y

Hukkelhoven

Hukkelhoven model

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

y

y

Maas

Rotterdam CT score

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

U

U

n

y

Perel

CRASH models

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

U

U

n

y

Steyerberg

IMPACT models

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

y

y

Jacobs

Nijmegen models

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

H

H

y

y

Yuan

Yuan models

L

L

L

L

L

U

L

H

H

n

y

  1. Risk of Bias: Low = L; High = H; Unclear = U
  2. Usability: No = n; Yes = y
  3. All models within the same publication were judged the same on applicability, risk of bias and usability and therefore results are reported per publication